What did z/Web-Host do?
z/Web-Host provided web-based access to mainframe applications by translating 3270 terminal screens into web pages. It acted as middleware, allowing users to interact with legacy systems through a standard web browser. Without it, organizations would need to rely on traditional terminal emulators or invest in more complex application modernization projects.
Was z/Web-Host a system, application, or tool?
z/Web-Host was middleware that sat between the mainframe and the user's web browser. It did not replace the underlying mainframe applications but provided a more user-friendly interface. It was suitable for organizations needing a quick and relatively inexpensive way to provide web access to existing 3270 applications.
What types of organizations used z/Web-Host?
Organizations with existing mainframe applications and a need to provide web-based access to those applications used z/Web-Host. These were often larger enterprises in industries like banking, insurance, and government. Companies needing to modernize their mainframe applications without extensive code changes found it useful.
When should organizations have considered z/Web-Host?
Companies considered z/Web-Host when they needed to provide web access to existing 3270 applications quickly and with minimal changes to the underlying mainframe systems. It was a good fit when a full-scale application rewrite was not feasible or cost-effective. However, it was not suitable for organizations seeking a more modern, feature-rich user experience.
What were the alternatives to z/Web-Host?
Alternatives to z/Web-Host include other screen scraping tools, terminal emulators with web integration capabilities, and full application modernization platforms. Examples include Virtel Web Modernization, IPBridge/Host, and z/Ware. These alternatives offer varying levels of functionality and integration with modern web technologies.