What infrastructure was required?

VM Batch Subsystem required a z/VM environment with CMS (Conversational Monitor System) installed. It leveraged CMS commands and facilities for job submission and management. No specific hardware was required beyond the standard z/VM environment.

For mainframe products: Did this run in an LPAR?

VM Batch Subsystem ran within a z/VM LPAR (Logical Partition). It was not directly dependent on z/OS, but it required the CMS component of z/VM to be operational. It did not require any specific z/VM subsystems beyond CMS.

Was this a standalone product or did it extend/enhance another product?

VM Batch Subsystem extended the capabilities of CMS by providing a mechanism for submitting and managing batch jobs. It was not a standalone product but rather an enhancement to the existing CMS environment.

What other products or components were required for this to work?

VM Batch Subsystem required a functional CMS environment within z/VM. This included the CMS command interpreter, file system, and other basic CMS utilities. Without CMS, VM Batch Subsystem would not operate.

What was the business value of using VM Batch Subsystem?

The primary business value of VM Batch Subsystem was increased efficiency and resource utilization. By offloading tasks to background processing, users could continue working on other tasks without waiting for long-running processes to complete. This improved overall productivity and reduced the demand on interactive system resources.

What would happen if an organization did not use this product?

Without VM Batch Subsystem, organizations would have to rely on interactive sessions for all processing, which could tie up terminal resources and reduce user productivity. Tasks that were suitable for batch processing would have to be run manually or using less efficient methods.

How did VM Batch Subsystem help optimize resource utilization?

VM Batch Subsystem helped organizations optimize their use of mainframe resources by allowing them to schedule batch jobs to run during off-peak hours. This reduced the load on the system during peak usage times and improved overall system performance.

How was security handled in VM Batch Subsystem?

Security in VM Batch Subsystem was primarily handled through the underlying z/VM security mechanisms. Access to batch jobs and their output was controlled through user IDs and file permissions. Specific authentication methods included standard z/VM logon procedures.

What access control model was used?

VM Batch Subsystem leveraged the access control model provided by z/VM and CMS. This typically involved assigning permissions to users and groups to control access to files, commands, and other system resources. The specific model was likely a form of Access Control Lists (ACLs).

What encryption was used and where?

Encryption was not a standard feature of VM Batch Subsystem itself. However, organizations could implement encryption at the file system level or within their batch jobs to protect sensitive data. This would typically involve using z/VM's encryption facilities or third-party encryption products.

How was VM Batch Subsystem typically deployed?

VM Batch Subsystem was typically deployed on-premise within a z/VM environment. It was not a cloud-based or SaaS solution. The implementation required technical expertise in z/VM and CMS administration.

What ongoing operational requirements existed?

Ongoing operational requirements for VM Batch Subsystem included monitoring batch job execution, managing job queues, and troubleshooting any errors or failures. This required skilled system programmers and operators familiar with z/VM and CMS.

What were common implementation challenges?

Common implementation challenges for VM Batch Subsystem included configuring the job queues, managing dependencies between jobs, and ensuring that the batch environment was properly secured. These challenges required careful planning and coordination between system administrators and application developers.

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Take control of your product listings. Add verified information, showcase updates, and unlock a Claimed Vendor badge across the directory.

Claim Your Listing Now

VM Batch Subsystem

IBM Not Supported z/VM

Batch

Vendor

IBM

Product Overview

VM Batch Subsystem was designed to provide background processing capabilities for CMS tasks running on the z/VM operating system. It allowed users to submit jobs for execution without direct interaction, improving resource utilization and user productivity. The architecture leveraged the z/VM environment, including the CMS command interpreter and file system, to manage batch job execution.

Key components included job queues, scheduling algorithms, and resource management modules. However, VM Batch Subsystem is no longer supported. Organizations should consider migrating to modern workload automation solutions such as CA Workload Automation, BMC Control-M, or IBM Workload Scheduler.

, REST APIs, message queues), and ongoing vendor support. The VM Batch Facility was the direct replacement, providing a more seamless transition. Modern solutions often incorporate microservices architectures and cloud-native deployments, offering greater scalability and resilience.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does VM Batch Subsystem do?

VM Batch Subsystem provided background processing capabilities for CMS (Conversational Monitor System) tasks on z/VM. It allowed users to submit jobs for execution without direct interaction, freeing up their terminal sessions.

Is this a system, application, or tool?

VM Batch Subsystem is a system that provides batch processing capabilities. It is not an application in the traditional sense, but rather a set of system-level functions that allow users to submit and manage batch jobs.

What types of organizations used this?

Organizations that needed to automate repetitive tasks or run long-running processes without tying up interactive terminal sessions would have used VM Batch Subsystem. These organizations typically had a z/VM environment and relied on CMS for application development and execution.

When should an organization have considered VM Batch Subsystem?

VM Batch Subsystem was considered when organizations needed to offload tasks from interactive sessions to background processing. This was particularly useful for tasks that did not require user interaction or that could be scheduled to run during off-peak hours.

What are the alternatives to VM Batch Subsystem?

Alternatives to VM Batch Subsystem include the VM Batch Facility, which replaced it, and other job scheduling and workload management tools available for z/VM. Modern workload automation solutions can also provide similar functionality.

Related Products

Active

by APS ENTERprise

z/OS

APS Advisor is a web interface designed to simplify the management and monitoring of automated batch job schedulers, such as Control-M. It addresses the challenges...

Java and Web Batch

View Details →

ASG-APC Batchmap

Supported

by Rocket Software

z/OS

ASG-APC Batchmap is a Java application designed to provide a graphical view of batch schedules on z/OS. The system comprises the Batchmap Server, Client Interface...

Tools and Utilities Administration

View Details →

Help Improve This Directory

Notice outdated information? Have insights about this product? Help the mainframe community stay informed with accurate, current data.

Report Issue Suggest Product Share Event

Share Your Product Experience

Help the community by sharing your experience with mainframe products. Your insights help others make informed decisions.

Share Your Experience