What was the underlying technical architecture of IMS Performance Monitor?

The product used a combination of batch jobs and online transactions. Batch jobs were used for data collection and report generation. Online transactions provided real-time monitoring capabilities. The specific commands and syntax varied depending on the function.

Did IMS Performance Monitor offer any APIs for integration with other systems?

The product did not expose APIs for external integration. Its primary interface was through JCL and online commands. Data extraction required custom programming using the available reports and data sets.

What business value did IMS Performance Monitor provide?

IMS Performance Monitor helped improve IMS system performance by identifying bottlenecks and optimizing resource usage. This led to faster transaction response times and improved overall system efficiency. It provided insights for capacity planning.

How did IMS Performance Monitor contribute to cost savings?

By identifying performance issues, the product helped reduce operational costs. It enabled more efficient use of system resources, minimizing the need for additional hardware. This resulted in cost savings and improved ROI.

How did IMS Performance Monitor support capacity planning?

The product provided data-driven insights for capacity planning. By analyzing historical performance data, administrators could forecast future resource needs. This helped ensure that the IMS system could handle increasing workloads.

How did IMS Performance Monitor improve user experience?

The product enabled proactive performance management. By monitoring key metrics, administrators could identify and address issues before they impacted users. This improved user satisfaction and system reliability.

What security features were included in IMS Performance Monitor?

IMS Performance Monitor did not have built-in security features like authentication or access control. Security relied on the underlying z/OS environment and IMS security settings. Users needed to ensure proper security configurations at the operating system and IMS levels.

How was user authentication handled?

The product relied on the z/OS security infrastructure for user authentication. This included methods like RACF or equivalent security managers. Access to the product's functions was controlled through z/OS security profiles.

How was access control implemented?

Access control was managed through z/OS security mechanisms, such as RACF. Users were granted permissions to specific resources and datasets. Proper configuration of these security profiles was essential to restrict access.

What auditing capabilities were available?

The product generated logs that could be used for auditing. These logs recorded system activity and performance data. Administrators could use these logs to monitor system behavior and identify potential security issues.

What administrative interfaces were available?

Administration was primarily performed through JCL and control statements. Users submitted JCL jobs to configure the product and generate reports. Control statements defined monitoring parameters and report options.

How was user management handled?

User management was handled through the z/OS security system. Administrators used RACF or similar tools to define user profiles and grant access to the necessary resources. This ensured proper access control.

What were the main configuration parameters?

Key configuration parameters included data set names, report intervals, and monitoring thresholds. These parameters were specified in JCL and control statements. Proper configuration was essential for accurate monitoring.

What monitoring and logging capabilities existed?

The product provided logging capabilities to record system activity and performance data. These logs were used for monitoring and troubleshooting. Administrators could analyze the logs to identify issues and optimize performance.

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Take control of your product listings. Add verified information, showcase updates, and unlock a Claimed Vendor badge across the directory.

Claim Your Listing Now

IMS Performance Monitor

IBM Not Supported z/OS

IMS Monitor

Vendor

IBM

Product Overview

The architecture comprised a data collection module, a reporting module, and an online display component. The data collection module gathered performance data from IMS control blocks and log files. The reporting module processed this data to generate reports.

The online display component provided real-time monitoring. Data collection was integrated with the IMS system to minimize overhead. Configuration was managed through JCL and control statements.

Users modified JCL to define data sets and report parameters. Control statements specified monitoring options and thresholds. For example, users would define data set names and report intervals.

The product did not expose any APIs for external integration. Security relied on the z/OS security infrastructure, with user authentication handled through RACF or similar tools. Access control was managed through z/OS security mechanisms.

The product generated logs that could be used for auditing. Since the product is not supported, users should migrate to a supported solution such as Tivoli Omegamon XE for IMS. This involves installing the new monitoring tool and configuring it to collect data from the IMS system.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the primary function of IMS Performance Monitor?

IMS Performance Monitor was designed to provide detailed performance data for IMS systems. It collected and analyzed data related to transaction response times, database activity, and system resource utilization. This information helped administrators identify performance bottlenecks and optimize IMS environments.

What specific performance metrics did IMS Performance Monitor track?

The product monitored various aspects of IMS performance, including transaction response times, database calls, and CPU usage. It provided reports and real-time displays to help users understand system behavior. This allowed for proactive identification of performance issues.

How did IMS Performance Monitor collect performance data?

IMS Performance Monitor collected data from IMS control blocks and log files. It processed this data to generate performance metrics and reports. The data collection process was integrated with the IMS system to minimize overhead.

What types of reporting and display options were available?

The product provided both batch reports and online displays. Batch reports offered historical performance data, while online displays provided real-time views of system activity. This dual approach allowed users to analyze performance trends and address immediate issues.

Help Improve This Directory

Notice outdated information? Have insights about this product? Help the mainframe community stay informed with accurate, current data.

Report Issue Suggest Product Share Event

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Take control of your product listings. Add verified information, showcase updates, and unlock a Claimed Vendor badge across the directory.

Claim Your Listing Now

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

IMS Performance Monitor

Product Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the primary function of IMS Performance Monitor?

What specific performance metrics did IMS Performance Monitor track?

How did IMS Performance Monitor collect performance data?

What types of reporting and display options were available?

What was the underlying technical architecture of IMS Performance Monitor?

How was IMS Performance Monitor configured?

Did IMS Performance Monitor offer any APIs for integration with other systems?

What were the main system components of IMS Performance Monitor?

What business value did IMS Performance Monitor provide?

How did IMS Performance Monitor contribute to cost savings?

How did IMS Performance Monitor support capacity planning?

How did IMS Performance Monitor improve user experience?

What security features were included in IMS Performance Monitor?

How was user authentication handled?

How was access control implemented?

What auditing capabilities were available?

What administrative interfaces were available?

How was user management handled?

What were the main configuration parameters?

What monitoring and logging capabilities existed?

Related Products

More from IBM

Similar Products

Help Improve This Directory

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing