What were the main components of 4Tune's architecture?

4Tune's architecture consisted of several key components, including the data collector, the data repository, and the reporting engine. The data collector gathered performance data from z/OS, the data repository stored the data, and the reporting engine generated reports and displays.

How did the components of 4Tune communicate with each other?

4Tune communicated between components using a combination of inter-process communication (IPC) mechanisms and shared memory. The specific mechanisms used depended on the configuration and the version of z/OS.

Where did 4Tune store the performance data it collected?

4Tune stored performance data in a proprietary data repository. The repository was designed for efficient storage and retrieval of time-series data.

Did 4Tune expose any APIs for integration with other systems?

4Tune did not expose standard APIs like REST or SOAP. Integration with other systems typically involved direct access to the data repository or the use of custom interfaces.

What business value did 4Tune provide?

4Tune provided insights into system performance, allowing organizations to identify bottlenecks and optimize resource utilization. This could lead to improved application performance and reduced operating costs.

How did 4Tune help organizations avoid outages?

By proactively monitoring system performance, 4Tune helped organizations avoid outages and service disruptions. This improved system availability and reduced the risk of business impact.

How did 4Tune assist with capacity planning?

4Tune's reporting capabilities allowed organizations to track performance trends over time, providing valuable insights for capacity planning and resource allocation.

How did 4Tune handle security?

4Tune used the security mechanisms provided by z/OS for authentication and authorization. It did not implement its own security model.

What access control model did 4Tune use?

4Tune leveraged z/OS security features such as RACF, ACF2, or Top Secret to control access to its data and functions. User access was typically managed through these external security systems.

Did 4Tune encrypt data?

4Tune did not encrypt data at rest or in transit. It relied on the underlying z/OS security infrastructure to protect data.

What audit logging capabilities did 4Tune have?

4Tune integrated with z/OS audit logging facilities to record security-related events. These logs could be used to track user activity and identify potential security breaches.

How was 4Tune administered?

4Tune was administered through a combination of ISPF panels and batch jobs. ISPF panels provided a user-friendly interface for configuring the product, while batch jobs were used for tasks such as data collection and report generation.

How was user management handled in 4Tune?

User management was handled through z/OS security systems such as RACF, ACF2, or Top Secret. 4Tune did not have its own user management capabilities.

What monitoring and logging capabilities did 4Tune have?

4Tune provided extensive logging capabilities, capturing information about system performance, data collection, and error conditions. These logs could be used to troubleshoot problems and monitor system health.

What ports did 4Tune require?

4Tune required specific ports for communication between its components. The exact ports used depended on the configuration and the version of z/OS.

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Take control of your product listings. Add verified information, showcase updates, and unlock a Claimed Vendor badge across the directory.

Claim Your Listing Now

4Tune

CAPEX Corporation Not Supported z/OS

Performance Operating System Monitor

Vendor

CAPEX Corporation

Product Overview

4Tune's architecture comprised a data collector, data repository, and reporting engine. The data collector gathered metrics from z/OS using SMF records and proprietary routines. The data repository stored time-series performance data.

The reporting engine generated reports and dashboards. Communication between components relied on IPC and shared memory. 4Tune lacked standard APIs, using direct data repository access or custom interfaces for integration.

Security depended on z/OS security systems (RACF, ACF2, Top Secret). Alternatives like IBM Z OMEGAMON offer a more modern architecture with REST APIs and enhanced security features. OMEGAMON's architecture includes agents, a Tivoli Enterprise Monitoring Server (TEMS), and a Tivoli Enterprise Portal (TEP), providing a scalable and flexible monitoring solution.

Consider migrating to OMEGAMON for improved architecture and integration capabilities.

Frequently Asked Questions

What types of performance data did 4Tune collect?

4Tune provided real-time and historical performance data for z/OS systems. It captured metrics related to CPU utilization, I/O activity, memory usage, and workload performance.

How did 4Tune collect performance data?

4Tune used a combination of SMF (System Management Facilities) data and its own proprietary data collection routines to gather performance metrics. SMF records provided system-level statistics, while 4Tune's routines captured more granular data.

Did 4Tune support alerting or threshold monitoring?

4Tune allowed users to define thresholds for various performance metrics. When a threshold was exceeded, 4Tune could generate alerts or notifications to inform operators of potential problems.

What types of reports and displays did 4Tune offer?

4Tune provided a range of reports and displays, including real-time dashboards, historical trend reports, and exception reports. These reports could be customized to focus on specific areas of interest.

Help Improve This Directory

Notice outdated information? Have insights about this product? Help the mainframe community stay informed with accurate, current data.

Report Issue Suggest Product Share Event

Share Your Product Experience

Help the community by sharing your experience with mainframe products. Your insights help others make informed decisions.

Share Your Experience