What infrastructure was required?

Unicenter DC Monitor Extensions required an existing IMS environment, specifically the IMS DC monitor. It extended the functionality of this monitor to include fastpath transactions.

For mainframe products: Does this run in an LPAR?

As a z/OS-based tool, Unicenter DC Monitor Extensions ran within an LPAR on a z/OS system. It was dependent on the IMS subsystem being active and configured correctly.

What APIs or interfaces did it use?

The tool likely used specific IMS APIs and control blocks to gather monitoring data. It would have communicated with the IMS control region to intercept and analyze transaction data.

How was it configured?

Configuration likely involved setting parameters within the IMS environment and defining specific transactions to monitor. This might have been done through control cards or a similar mechanism.

What was the business value?

The primary business value was improved monitoring and management of IMS fastpath transactions. This allowed organizations to optimize performance, reduce response times, and quickly identify and resolve issues.

What happened without it?

Without this tool, organizations would have had less visibility into the performance of their IMS fastpath transactions. This could lead to slower response times, increased errors, and difficulty in troubleshooting problems.

How did it improve business efficiency?

The tool helped in optimizing transaction processing, ensuring faster response times for critical applications. This directly contributed to improved customer satisfaction and business efficiency.

How was security handled?

Security would have been integrated with the existing IMS security framework. This likely involved leveraging RACF or a similar security system to control access to monitoring data and administrative functions.

What access control model was used?

Access control was likely based on roles, with different users having different levels of access to monitoring data and administrative functions. This ensured that sensitive information was protected.

What audit/logging capabilities existed?

Audit logging would have been a key feature, tracking user activity and changes to configuration parameters. This provided a record of who accessed what data and when.

What were the ongoing operational requirements?

Ongoing operations would have involved monitoring the tool's performance, ensuring it was collecting data correctly, and troubleshooting any issues that arose. This required skilled mainframe systems programmers.

What were common implementation challenges?

Implementation challenges likely included integrating the tool with the existing IMS environment, configuring it correctly, and ensuring it did not negatively impact performance. Expertise in IMS internals was crucial.

What administrative interfaces were available?

The tool likely provided some form of administrative interface, possibly a set of TSO commands or a panel-driven interface. This allowed administrators to configure the tool, monitor its status, and view collected data.

Share Your Product Experience

Help the community by sharing your experience with mainframe products. Your insights help others make informed decisions.

Share Your Experience

Unicenter DC Monitor Extensions

CA Technologies Not Supported z/OS

Tools and Utilities IMS Databases Monitor

Vendor

CA Technologies

Product Overview

Unicenter DC Monitor Extensions was designed to extend the IMS DC monitor, providing enhanced monitoring capabilities for fastpath transactions within a z/OS environment. Architecturally, it likely intercepted IMS control blocks and leveraged IMS APIs to gather transaction data. The tool provided real-time monitoring and historical analysis, enabling architects to understand transaction flows, identify bottlenecks, and optimize IMS application performance.

It integrated with existing z/OS security systems for access control and auditing. As Unicenter DC Monitor Extensions is no longer supported, architects should consider alternative solutions that offer similar capabilities. Options include IBM IMS Connect, which provides connectivity and monitoring features, and third-party IMS monitoring tools that offer comprehensive analysis and reporting.

When selecting a replacement, architects should evaluate factors such as integration with existing systems, scalability, security, and ease of use. The chosen solution should align with the organization's overall architectural strategy and provide the necessary insights for managing IMS environments effectively. A custom solution leveraging the IMS API may also be considered.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Unicenter DC Monitor Extensions do?

Unicenter DC Monitor Extensions was a tool designed to extend the capabilities of the IMS DC monitor, specifically for fastpath transactions. It helped in monitoring and managing these transactions within an IMS environment.

Was this a system, application, or tool?

This was a tool, originally part of the Innovative Designs IMS Toolkit, later functionally stabilized by Computer Associates. It was designed to enhance the monitoring capabilities within an IMS environment.

What types of organizations used this?

Organizations that relied on IMS for transaction processing, particularly those using fastpath transactions, would have found this tool useful. These were typically larger enterprises in industries like banking, finance, and insurance.

When would someone consider using Unicenter DC Monitor Extensions?

Companies would have considered using Unicenter DC Monitor Extensions when they needed enhanced monitoring capabilities for IMS fastpath transactions. This would be crucial for optimizing performance and troubleshooting issues in real-time.

What are the alternatives to Unicenter DC Monitor Extensions?

Given that Unicenter DC Monitor Extensions is no longer supported, alternatives include IBM IMS Connect, various third-party IMS monitoring tools, and custom-built monitoring solutions leveraging IMS APIs.

Help Improve This Directory

Notice outdated information? Have insights about this product? Help the mainframe community stay informed with accurate, current data.

Report Issue Suggest Product Share Event

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Take control of your product listings. Add verified information, showcase updates, and unlock a Claimed Vendor badge across the directory.

Claim Your Listing Now

Share Your Product Experience

Unicenter DC Monitor Extensions

Product Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Unicenter DC Monitor Extensions do?

Was this a system, application, or tool?

What types of organizations used this?

When would someone consider using Unicenter DC Monitor Extensions?

What are the alternatives to Unicenter DC Monitor Extensions?

What infrastructure was required?

For mainframe products: Does this run in an LPAR?

What APIs or interfaces did it use?

How was it configured?

What was the business value?

What happened without it?

How did it improve business efficiency?

How was security handled?

What access control model was used?

What audit/logging capabilities existed?

What were the ongoing operational requirements?

What were common implementation challenges?

What administrative interfaces were available?

Related Products

More from CA Technologies

ADC2

AutoMate

CA 90s

CA Alert/VM

CA APAS Insight

CA Automated Code Structuring for COBOL

Similar Products

_beta access admin

_beta access audit

_beta access easy

_beta doc|z plus

_beta doc|z transform

(E)JES

Help Improve This Directory

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing