How did Problem Program Evaluator technically work?

PPE operated by sampling the program's execution and collecting data on CPU usage and wait times at different memory addresses. This data was then aggregated and presented in reports that highlighted the areas of highest activity.

What were the common commands and configuration options in PPE?

While specific commands are not available due to the product's age and lack of support, typical operations would have involved specifying the program to be analyzed, setting sampling intervals, and generating reports. Configuration likely involved setting parameters for data collection and report formatting.

What kind of APIs did PPE expose for integration?

Given its age, PPE likely did not expose modern APIs like REST or SOAP. Integration would have been achieved through custom programming, potentially using system calls or other low-level interfaces specific to the z/OS environment.

What was the architecture of Problem Program Evaluator?

The architecture likely consisted of a data collection component running on z/OS, a data storage mechanism (possibly VSAM or sequential files), and a reporting component. Communication between components would have been through z/OS system services.

How did PPE provide business value?

By identifying and resolving performance bottlenecks, PPE helped to improve application response times and reduce CPU consumption. This translated into cost savings through more efficient use of computing resources.

What were the key business benefits of using PPE?

PPE enabled organizations to optimize their critical applications, leading to improved service levels and increased user satisfaction. Faster processing times also allowed businesses to handle larger volumes of transactions.

How did PPE help IT departments make better decisions?

The insights provided by PPE allowed IT departments to make informed decisions about application tuning and resource allocation, leading to better overall system performance and stability.

How was security handled in PPE?

Given its age, PPE likely relied on basic z/OS security mechanisms. Authentication would have been handled through RACF or similar security systems. Access control would have been based on user IDs and group memberships.

Did PPE use encryption?

Encryption was likely not a standard feature in PPE. Data security would have relied on the underlying z/OS security infrastructure and physical security measures.

What kind of audit logging capabilities did PPE have?

PPE likely provided basic audit logging capabilities, recording user access and report generation activities. These logs could be used to track usage and identify potential security breaches.

How was PPE administered?

Administration of PPE likely involved using z/OS system commands and configuration files. User management would have been handled through RACF or similar security systems.

How was PPE monitored?

Monitoring PPE's performance would have involved tracking CPU usage, memory consumption, and disk I/O activity. Logging capabilities would have provided insights into program execution and potential errors.

What kind of configuration parameters were available in PPE?

Configuration parameters would have included settings for data collection intervals, report formatting options, and security settings. These parameters would have been stored in configuration files or system datasets.

Share Your Product Experience

Help the community by sharing your experience with mainframe products. Your insights help others make informed decisions.

Share Your Experience

Problem Program Evaluator

BMC Not Supported z/OS

Performance Application Development Monitor

Vendor

BMC

Product Overview

Problem Program Evaluator (PPE) was designed to analyze the performance of individual programs running on z/OS. Its architecture consisted of a data collection component that sampled program execution, a data storage mechanism (likely VSAM or sequential files), and a reporting component. PPE identified bottlenecks by pinpointing areas of high CPU consumption and excessive wait times, down to specific memory addresses within the program's code.

Communication between components relied on z/OS system services. While PPE is no longer supported, modern alternatives offer enhanced architectures and capabilities. For example, Compuware Topaz utilizes an agent-based architecture for real-time data collection and analysis.

Topaz integrates with various development tools and provides a visual interface for performance analysis. IBM z/OS Performance Management offers a more comprehensive approach, monitoring the entire z/OS environment and providing insights into system-wide performance. PPE's reporting component generated static reports; modern tools offer interactive dashboards and customizable alerts.

PPE relied on RACF for security; modern tools support more advanced authentication methods like multi-factor authentication.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the primary purpose of Problem Program Evaluator?

Problem Program Evaluator (PPE) was designed to identify performance bottlenecks within individual programs running on z/OS. It pinpointed areas of high CPU consumption and excessive wait times by analyzing program execution at a granular level.

What kind of information did PPE provide to developers?

PPE provided detailed reports that highlighted the specific addresses within a program where the most CPU time was being spent or where the program was experiencing significant wait times. This allowed developers to focus their optimization efforts on the most problematic areas.

In what scenarios was PPE commonly used?

PPE was often used to optimize batch processing jobs, online transaction processing (OLTP) applications, and other critical workloads running on z/OS. By identifying and resolving performance bottlenecks, PPE helped to improve overall system throughput and reduce response times.

What were the key benefits of using PPE?

PPE's analysis capabilities helped reduce the consumption of system resources, such as CPU and memory, leading to lower operating costs. Improved application performance also translated into better user experience and increased business productivity.

Help Improve This Directory

Notice outdated information? Have insights about this product? Help the mainframe community stay informed with accurate, current data.

Report Issue Suggest Product Share Event

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Take control of your product listings. Add verified information, showcase updates, and unlock a Claimed Vendor badge across the directory.

Claim Your Listing Now

Share Your Product Experience

Problem Program Evaluator

Product Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the primary purpose of Problem Program Evaluator?

What kind of information did PPE provide to developers?

In what scenarios was PPE commonly used?

What were the key benefits of using PPE?

How did Problem Program Evaluator technically work?

What were the common commands and configuration options in PPE?

What kind of APIs did PPE expose for integration?

What was the architecture of Problem Program Evaluator?

How did PPE provide business value?

What were the key business benefits of using PPE?

How did PPE help IT departments make better decisions?

How was security handled in PPE?

Did PPE use encryption?

What kind of audit logging capabilities did PPE have?

How was PPE administered?

How was PPE monitored?

What kind of configuration parameters were available in PPE?

Related Products

More from BMC

3270 SUPEROPTIMIZER/CICS

3270 SUPEROPTIMIZER/IMS

Administrative Assistant for DB2

Alter for DB2

Application Restart Control for DB2

Application Restart Control for IMS

Similar Products

4Tune

Ab Initio Business Rules Environment

ABARS/Assist

Access 1

Access Manager for CICS

Access Manager for IMS

Help Improve This Directory

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing