For mainframe products: Did this run in an LPAR?

CA Opera ran on the z/OS operating system within an LPAR. It was dependent on z/OS and required specific subsystems to function.

How was user management handled?

User management was handled through z/OS security systems such as RACF, ACF2, or Top Secret. These systems controlled access to CA Opera's functions and resources.

What administrative interfaces were available?

CA Opera provided administrative interfaces through both a command-line interface (CLI) and potentially a GUI, depending on the specific version and configuration. The CLI allowed administrators to define rules, configure parameters, and monitor system activity.

What was the business value of CA Opera?

CA Opera automated responses to console messages, reducing the need for manual intervention and improving operational efficiency. This automation helped organizations maintain system availability and respond quickly to critical events.

When should an organization have considered CA Opera?

Organizations should have considered CA Opera when they needed to automate responses to z/OS console messages to improve operational efficiency and reduce the risk of human error. It was particularly valuable for organizations with stringent uptime requirements.

What were the consequences of not using CA Opera?

Without CA Opera, organizations would have needed to rely on manual monitoring and intervention, which is slower, more expensive, and more prone to errors. This could lead to delayed responses to critical events and increased downtime.

How did CA Opera handle security?

CA Opera integrated with z/OS security systems such as RACF, ACF2, and Top Secret to control access to its functions and resources. This ensured that only authorized personnel could define rules and execute actions.

What access control model was used?

CA Opera used the access control model provided by the underlying z/OS security system (RACF, ACF2, Top Secret). This model allowed administrators to define granular permissions for users and groups, controlling their access to specific functions and resources within CA Opera.

What audit/logging capabilities existed?

CA Opera provided audit logging capabilities to track user activity and system events. These logs could be used to monitor security and compliance.

How was CA Opera typically deployed?

CA Opera was typically deployed on-premise within the z/OS environment. Implementation required expertise in z/OS systems and security.

What ongoing operational requirements existed?

Ongoing operational requirements included monitoring system logs, maintaining rule definitions, and ensuring the availability of the z/OS environment. Staffing requirements included system programmers and security administrators with z/OS expertise.

What were common implementation challenges?

Common implementation challenges included integrating CA Opera with existing z/OS security systems, defining appropriate rule definitions, and ensuring the stability of the z/OS environment.

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Take control of your product listings. Add verified information, showcase updates, and unlock a Claimed Vendor badge across the directory.

Claim Your Listing Now

CA Opera

Broadcom Not Supported z/OS

Operating System Automation

Vendor

Broadcom

Product Overview

CA Opera was a software product designed to automate responses to console messages within the z/OS operating system. It automated actions based on system events, reducing the need for manual intervention and improving operational efficiency. This was particularly valuable for large enterprises requiring high availability and rapid response times.

CA Opera ran on the z/OS operating system within an LPAR and required specific subsystems to function. Its architecture included components for message monitoring, rule definition, and action execution. These components communicated through internal interfaces to process console messages and trigger automated responses.

It integrated with z/OS security systems such as RACF, ACF2, and Top Secret for user management and access control. User management was handled through z/OS security systems. The administrative interface was available through a command-line interface (CLI).

Alternatives to CA Opera include Rocket ZACK, OPS/MVS, and BMC AMI Ops Automation for z/OS. These products offer similar capabilities for automating z/OS console message responses.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did CA Opera do?

CA Opera was a software product designed to automate actions based on console messages within the z/OS operating system. It enabled automated responses to system events, reducing manual intervention. It was a tool set.

What would happen if an organization did not use CA Opera?

CA Opera automated responses to console messages, ensuring timely actions. Without it, organizations would need to rely on manual monitoring and intervention, which is slower and more prone to errors.

What types of organizations used CA Opera?

CA Opera was most applicable to large enterprises using the z/OS operating system, particularly those in industries requiring high availability and rapid response to system events, such as banking and finance. A company should have considered using it when they needed to automate responses to z/OS console messages to improve operational efficiency.

What infrastructure was required?

CA Opera required the z/OS operating system and its associated subsystems. It was deployed on-premise.

What are the alternatives to CA Opera?

Alternatives to CA Opera include Rocket ZACK, OPS/MVS, and BMC AMI Ops Automation for z/OS. These products offer similar capabilities for automating z/OS console message responses.

Help Improve This Directory

Notice outdated information? Have insights about this product? Help the mainframe community stay informed with accurate, current data.

Report Issue Suggest Product Share Event

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Take control of your product listings. Add verified information, showcase updates, and unlock a Claimed Vendor badge across the directory.

Claim Your Listing Now

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

CA Opera

Product Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

What did CA Opera do?

What would happen if an organization did not use CA Opera?

What types of organizations used CA Opera?

What infrastructure was required?

What are the alternatives to CA Opera?

For mainframe products: Did this run in an LPAR?

What were the main system components?

How was user management handled?

What administrative interfaces were available?

What was the business value of CA Opera?

When should an organization have considered CA Opera?

What were the consequences of not using CA Opera?

How did CA Opera handle security?

What access control model was used?

What audit/logging capabilities existed?

How was CA Opera typically deployed?

What ongoing operational requirements existed?

What were common implementation challenges?

Related Products

More from Broadcom

AcceleREXX

ACF2

Allocate DASD Space and Placement

Auditor for z/OS

Automation Point

Bind Analyzer for Db2

Similar Products

_beta access monitor

(E)JES

$avers

4Tune

ABARS/Assist

ACC

Help Improve This Directory

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing