What administrative interfaces were available for managing the product?

The product used a combination of command-line interfaces (CLIs) and a graphical user interface (GUI) accessible through the Tivoli Enterprise Portal (TEP). The CLI allowed for scripting and automation of monitoring tasks, while the GUI provided a visual representation of the monitored data.

How was the product configured, and what were some key configuration parameters?

Configuration was managed through configuration files and the Tivoli Enterprise Portal (TEP). Specific parameters included thresholds for alerts, data collection intervals, and connection details for the WebSphere Message Broker environment. The TEP provided a centralized interface for configuring and managing these settings.

How did the product collect data from the WebSphere Message Broker?

The product collected data through agents that interacted with the WebSphere Message Broker. The agents gathered performance metrics, resource utilization, and message flow statistics. This data was then transmitted to the Tivoli Enterprise Monitoring Server (TEMS) for processing and storage.

What database or storage mechanisms were used by the product?

The product used the Tivoli Monitoring infrastructure for data storage. This typically involved a relational database, such as DB2, to store the collected monitoring data. This allowed for historical analysis and reporting of performance trends.

What was the primary business value of using this product?

The product provided visibility into the performance of WebSphere Message Broker environments. This allowed administrators to proactively identify and resolve performance bottlenecks, ensuring the smooth operation of message flows and applications. This helped to reduce downtime and improve overall system efficiency.

How did the product contribute to the reliability of message-driven applications?

By monitoring message flows and broker resources, the product helped to ensure the reliable delivery of messages. This was critical for applications that relied on timely and accurate message processing. The product helped to maintain service level agreements (SLAs) and minimize disruptions.

How did the product help in proactive problem detection and resolution?

The product enabled proactive problem detection. By monitoring key performance indicators (KPIs) and setting thresholds, administrators could be alerted to potential issues before they impacted the business. This allowed for faster resolution and reduced the impact of problems.

What security features were provided by the product?

The product leveraged the security features of the underlying Tivoli Monitoring infrastructure. This included user authentication, authorization, and data encryption. Access control was managed through the Tivoli Enterprise Portal (TEP).

What authentication methods were supported?

Authentication was handled through the Tivoli Monitoring infrastructure, which supported various methods, including user IDs and passwords. The product integrated with the existing security framework of the z/OS environment.

What access control model was used?

Access control was managed through the Tivoli Monitoring infrastructure, which used a role-based access control (RBAC) model. Users were assigned roles that determined their level of access to monitoring data and administrative functions. This ensured that users only had access to the information and functionality they needed.

What encryption capabilities were available?

Data encryption was provided by the underlying Tivoli Monitoring infrastructure. This ensured that sensitive data transmitted between the agents, the TEMS, and the TEP was protected. Encryption helped to prevent unauthorized access to monitoring data.

What logging capabilities were available?

The product generated logs for auditing and troubleshooting purposes. These logs recorded events such as agent startup and shutdown, configuration changes, and error messages. The logs were accessible through the Tivoli Enterprise Portal (TEP) and could be used to diagnose issues.

What monitoring capabilities were available for operations?

Administrators could use the Tivoli Enterprise Portal (TEP) to monitor the status of agents, brokers, and message flows. The TEP provided a real-time view of the monitored environment, allowing administrators to quickly identify and address issues.

Share Your Product Experience

Help the community by sharing your experience with mainframe products. Your insights help others make informed decisions.

Share Your Experience

Tivoli Omegamon XE for WebSphere Integration Brokers

IBM Not Supported z/OS

MQ Messaging and SOA Monitor

Vendor

IBM

Product Overview

The architecture of Tivoli Omegamon XE for WebSphere Integration Brokers comprised several key components. The core components included agents deployed on the z/OS platform, the Tivoli Enterprise Monitoring Server (TEMS), and the Tivoli Enterprise Portal (TEP). The agents collected data from the WebSphere Message Broker environment, including message flow statistics, broker resource utilization (CPU, memory), and message queue performance.

The agents communicated with the TEMS using network protocols. The TEMS processed and stored the collected data, typically in a relational database like DB2. The TEP provided a GUI for visualizing the data, configuring alerts, and managing the monitoring environment.

The agents used configuration files to define the specific metrics to be collected and the thresholds for alerts. The communication between the agents and the TEMS used proprietary protocols. The product's reliance on the Tivoli Monitoring infrastructure meant that it integrated with other Tivoli products.

The product is not supported. Organizations should migrate to a supported monitoring solution, such as Tivoli Omegamon XE for Messaging, which offers a similar architecture but with updated features and support.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the primary function of Tivoli Omegamon XE for WebSphere Integration Brokers?

Tivoli Omegamon XE for WebSphere Integration Brokers provided monitoring capabilities for WebSphere Message Broker environments. It collected and presented performance data, allowing administrators to identify and resolve issues within the message flows and broker infrastructure. The product is no longer supported.

What specific aspects of WebSphere Message Broker did the product monitor?

The product monitored message flows, broker resources (CPU, memory), and message queue performance. It provided alerts based on predefined thresholds and historical data analysis. The monitoring data was accessible through the Tivoli Enterprise Portal.

How did Tivoli Omegamon XE for WebSphere Integration Brokers integrate with the broader Tivoli Monitoring environment?

The product used the Tivoli Monitoring infrastructure to collect, manage, and present monitoring data. This involved agents deployed on the z/OS platform that communicated with the Tivoli Enterprise Monitoring Server (TEMS). The TEMS then provided the data to the Tivoli Enterprise Portal (TEP) for analysis and visualization.

What were the primary deployment platforms for this product?

The product was primarily deployed on the z/OS platform. It utilized agents that collected data from the WebSphere Message Broker environment and communicated with the Tivoli Enterprise Monitoring Server (TEMS).

Related Products

Performance Operating System

View Details →

ABARS/Assist

Active

by 21st Century Software

z/OS

ABARS/Assist is designed to automate and monitor DFSMShsm ABARS backups. The core components include the Backup Manager, the Restore Manager, and the Monitoring Agent. These...

Backup and Restore Files and Datasets

View Details →

Access 1

Not Supported

by IBM

z/OS

Alternatives available

Access 1 was a system monitoring tool designed to provide a centralized view of system resources across multiple platforms, including z/OS. It collected data from...

Operating System Application/Application Enviroment

View Details →

ACI Communication Services

Active

by ACI Payment Systems

z/OS

ACI Communication Services is a financial messaging platform designed for high availability and secure message exchange. The core architecture includes the Message Router, Protocol Adapters,...

Application - Banking/Finance MQ

View Details →

Across the Boards

Active

by cfSoftware

z/OSzVSE/VSEn

Across the Boards provides a robust solution for integrating Windows and mainframe environments. The core architecture comprises the APPX Router, XAPI, and communication protocol stacks...

MQ Messaging and SOA

View Details →

Adabas Review

Active

by Software AG

z/OSz/VMzVSE/VSEn

Adabas Review provides comprehensive performance monitoring for Adabas databases. Key components include the Review Collector, which gathers performance data, and the Review Analyzer, which processes...

ADABAS Performance

View Details →

Help Improve This Directory

Notice outdated information? Have insights about this product? Help the mainframe community stay informed with accurate, current data.

Report Issue Suggest Product Share Event

Share Your Product Experience

Help the community by sharing your experience with mainframe products. Your insights help others make informed decisions.

Share Your Experience

Share Your Product Experience

Tivoli Omegamon XE for WebSphere Integration Brokers

Product Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the primary function of Tivoli Omegamon XE for WebSphere Integration Brokers?

What specific aspects of WebSphere Message Broker did the product monitor?

How did Tivoli Omegamon XE for WebSphere Integration Brokers integrate with the broader Tivoli Monitoring environment?

What were the primary deployment platforms for this product?

What administrative interfaces were available for managing the product?

How was the product configured, and what were some key configuration parameters?

How did the product collect data from the WebSphere Message Broker?

What database or storage mechanisms were used by the product?

What was the primary business value of using this product?

How did the product contribute to the reliability of message-driven applications?

How did the product help in proactive problem detection and resolution?

What security features were provided by the product?

What authentication methods were supported?

What access control model was used?

What encryption capabilities were available?

What logging capabilities were available?

What monitoring capabilities were available for operations?

What were the operational considerations for deploying and managing the product?

Related Products

More from IBM

Similar Products

Help Improve This Directory

Share Your Product Experience