What infrastructure was required?

FLIC ran on the zVSE/VSEn operating system. It was designed to directly interact with VSE libraries, requiring access to the system's file management and storage subsystems.

For mainframe products: Did this run in an LPAR?

As a mainframe product, FLIC ran within an LPAR (Logical Partition) on the mainframe. It was not directly z/OS dependent but relied on the VSE environment for its operation. It did not require specific subsystems beyond the standard VSE file management system.

What were the common commands and configuration methods?

FLIC likely used standard VSE system commands and interfaces for its operations. Specific commands would have included those for library compression, reorganization, and backup. Configuration would have been managed through VSE system parameters and control cards.

What were the main system components and how did they communicate?

FLIC's architecture likely involved direct access to VSE libraries through system calls and file management routines. It would have consisted of modules for compression, reorganization, and backup, communicating through internal VSE mechanisms.

What was the business value of using FLIC?

The primary business value of FLIC was to improve the efficiency and reliability of VSE library management. By providing tools for compression, reorganization, and backup, it helped organizations optimize system performance, reduce storage costs, and protect against data loss.

What would happen if an organization did not use FLIC?

Without FLIC, organizations would have relied on less efficient or more manual methods for VSE library maintenance. This could result in slower system performance, higher storage costs, increased risk of data loss, and greater administrative overhead.

How did FLIC integrate with existing systems?

FLIC likely integrated with existing VSE systems and file management infrastructure. It would have used standard VSE interfaces and protocols to access and manipulate library data. Integration with other systems would have been limited, as it was primarily a library management tool.

How was security handled in FLIC?

Security in FLIC would have been managed through the VSE operating system's security mechanisms. This includes user authentication, access controls, and authorization levels. FLIC would have relied on VSE's security features to protect library data and prevent unauthorized access.

What access control model was used?

FLIC likely used the access control model provided by the VSE operating system. This would have involved assigning users to groups and granting permissions based on group membership. Specific access control lists (ACLs) might have been used to control access to individual libraries or datasets.

What audit/logging capabilities existed?

FLIC's audit and logging capabilities would have been integrated with the VSE system's logging facilities. This would have allowed administrators to track user activity, monitor system performance, and identify potential security breaches. Specific audit trails would have been generated for library management operations.

How was FLIC administered?

Administration of FLIC would have been performed through the VSE system console or a dedicated administrative interface. User management would have been handled through VSE's user administration tools. Configuration parameters would have been set using VSE system parameters and control cards.

What were common implementation challenges?

Implementing FLIC would have required expertise in VSE system administration and library management. Common challenges would have included ensuring compatibility with existing VSE systems, configuring the tool correctly, and training staff on its use.

What ongoing operational requirements existed?

Ongoing operational requirements for FLIC would have included monitoring system performance, performing regular backups, and applying any necessary updates or patches. Staffing requirements would have included VSE system administrators and library management personnel.

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Take control of your product listings. Add verified information, showcase updates, and unlock a Claimed Vendor badge across the directory.

Claim Your Listing Now

FLIC

Sterling Software Not Supported zVSE/VSEn

Administration Files and Datasets

Vendor

Sterling Software

Product Overview

FLIC was a VSE library maintenance tool designed as a replacement for IBM's CORGZ utility. It provided essential functions for managing VSE libraries on zVSE/VSEn systems. These included compression, reorganization, and backup of library data, critical for maintaining system performance and data integrity.

FLIC's architecture involved direct interaction with VSE libraries through system calls and file management routines. It consisted of modules for compression, reorganization, and backup, communicating through internal VSE mechanisms. Given that FLIC is no longer supported, a migration to alternative solutions is necessary.

When designing a replacement architecture, consider the following: * **SPEDIT, CA Librarian, CA Panvalet:** Evaluate these options for feature parity. * **Integration:** Ensure seamless integration with existing VSE systems and workflows. * **Security:** Implement robust security measures to protect library data and prevent unauthorized access.

* **Scalability:** Design the architecture to handle increasing data volumes and user loads. * **Monitoring:** Implement comprehensive monitoring and logging capabilities to track system performance and identify potential issues. By addressing these architectural considerations, organizations can ensure a smooth transition to a supported VSE library management solution.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does FLIC do?

FLIC was a VSE library maintenance tool, intended as a replacement for IBM's CORGZ utility. It provided functions for managing and manipulating VSE libraries, including tasks like compressing, reorganizing, and backing up library data.

Is this a system, application, or tool?

FLIC is best described as a tool, specifically designed for library maintenance within the zVSE/VSEn environment. It provided utilities for managing and optimizing VSE libraries, enhancing system performance and data integrity.

What types of organizations used this?

Organizations using the zVSE/VSEn operating system, particularly those managing large or complex VSE libraries, would have found FLIC useful. These organizations typically include businesses in sectors like finance, insurance, and government that rely on mainframe systems for core operations.

When should we have considered FLIC?

Companies would have considered using FLIC when they needed a more efficient and robust solution for managing their VSE libraries than the standard IBM CORGZ utility. This includes situations where library performance was critical, or when enhanced data protection and reorganization capabilities were required.

What are the alternatives to FLIC?

Alternatives to FLIC include other VSE library management tools, such as SPEDIT or manual procedures using standard VSE utilities. Modern alternatives might involve migrating to newer systems or using more comprehensive data management solutions that support VSE environments.

Help Improve This Directory

Notice outdated information? Have insights about this product? Help the mainframe community stay informed with accurate, current data.

Report Issue Suggest Product Share Event

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Take control of your product listings. Add verified information, showcase updates, and unlock a Claimed Vendor badge across the directory.

Claim Your Listing Now

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

FLIC

Product Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

What does FLIC do?

Is this a system, application, or tool?

What types of organizations used this?

When should we have considered FLIC?

What are the alternatives to FLIC?

What infrastructure was required?

For mainframe products: Did this run in an LPAR?

What were the common commands and configuration methods?

What were the main system components and how did they communicate?

What was the business value of using FLIC?

What would happen if an organization did not use FLIC?

How did FLIC integrate with existing systems?

How was security handled in FLIC?

What access control model was used?

What audit/logging capabilities existed?

How was FLIC administered?

What were common implementation challenges?

What ongoing operational requirements existed?

Related Products

More from Sterling Software

DYL/INTERFACE

FLIM

KPROBE

V/Solution

Similar Products

_beta access admin

_beta access audit

_beta access easy

_beta access monitor

ABARS/Assist

ACI Proactive Risk Manager

Help Improve This Directory

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing