What was the command structure of TUAM?

TUAM's command structure involved utilities for data processing, report generation, and system administration. Common operations included starting and stopping data collection, processing SMF data, and generating reports. The exact syntax varied depending on the specific utility.

What configuration files or interfaces were used?

TUAM used configuration files to define how SMF data was processed and formatted into reports. These files specified data selection criteria, report layouts, and other parameters. The product did not expose APIs for direct integration.

What were the main system components and how did they communicate?

The main system components of TUAM included the SMF data collector, the data processing engine, and the reporting module. These components communicated through internal interfaces and file systems. Data was typically stored in VSAM datasets.

What types of APIs did TUAM expose?

TUAM did not expose any APIs. It relied on batch processing and configuration files for its operations. There were no direct integration points for other applications or systems.

What was the business value of TUAM?

TUAM provided insights into resource consumption, enabling organizations to understand how resources were being used. This information could be used for capacity planning, cost allocation, and identifying areas for optimization. The product helped in managing z/OS resource utilization.

How did TUAM help with cost management?

By providing detailed reports on resource usage, TUAM helped organizations allocate costs more accurately. This allowed for better chargeback mechanisms and improved financial management of IT resources. It facilitated cost-effective resource utilization.

How did TUAM help with resource optimization?

TUAM's reporting capabilities enabled organizations to identify trends in resource usage. This information could be used to optimize resource allocation, improve performance, and reduce costs. It provided a basis for informed decision-making.

What authentication methods were supported?

TUAM did not have built-in authentication methods. Security was handled through z/OS security features, such as RACF or similar security products. Access control was managed at the z/OS level.

What access control model was used?

Access control was managed through z/OS security mechanisms, such as RACF. This allowed administrators to define user permissions and restrict access to sensitive data and functions. The product relied on the underlying z/OS security model.

What encryption was used and where?

TUAM did not provide encryption capabilities. Security relied on the underlying z/OS security features and any encryption implemented at the system level. Data security was managed through the z/OS environment.

What audit/logging capabilities existed?

TUAM had logging capabilities to record system events and user activities. These logs could be used for auditing and security analysis. The extent of logging depended on the configuration and the underlying z/OS system.

How was user management handled?

User management was handled through z/OS security mechanisms, such as RACF. TUAM did not have its own user management features. User access was controlled at the z/OS level.

What were the main configuration parameters?

The main configuration parameters were defined in JCL and configuration files. These parameters controlled data selection, report formats, and other operational aspects. Configuration changes required updates to JCL and configuration files.

What monitoring/logging capabilities existed?

Monitoring and logging capabilities were provided through z/OS system tools and TUAM's logging features. System events and activities were recorded in logs for auditing and troubleshooting. Monitoring was integrated with the z/OS environment.

Share Your Product Experience

Help the community by sharing your experience with mainframe products. Your insights help others make informed decisions.

Share Your Experience

Tivoli Usage and Accounting Manager for z/OS

IBM Not Supported z/OS

Report Generation and Management Usage Accounting/SMF

Vendor

IBM

Product Overview

The architecture of Tivoli Usage and Accounting Manager for z/OS (TUAM) comprised several key components designed to process and report on System Management Facility (SMF) data. The main components included the SMF data collector, the data processing engine, and the reporting module. The SMF data collector was responsible for retrieving SMF records from the z/OS system.

This component interacted with the z/OS system to access SMF data. The data processing engine was the core of TUAM, responsible for analyzing and processing the SMF data. This component used configuration files to define how the data was processed, including data selection criteria, calculations, and formatting.

The reporting module generated reports based on the processed data. This module used predefined report formats and allowed for customization through configuration files. The communication between these components was primarily through internal interfaces and file systems.

The SMF data collector would pass the collected data to the data processing engine. The data processing engine would then process the data and pass the results to the reporting module. Data was typically stored in VSAM datasets.

The administrative interfaces were primarily through JCL and system utilities. There was no GUI or web console. Configuration was managed through JCL and configuration files.

Monitoring was performed through z/OS system monitoring tools. Since TUAM is no longer supported, organizations should consider alternative solutions for resource usage accounting and reporting, such as IBM Z System Management Facilities (ZSMF) or third-party products like BMC AMI Cost Analyzer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was Tivoli Usage and Accounting Manager for z/OS?

Tivoli Usage and Accounting Manager for z/OS (TUAM) was a software product designed to measure computer resource usage on z/OS systems. It collected and processed System Management Facility (SMF) data to generate reports on resource consumption by users, applications, and other criteria. The product is no longer supported by IBM.

What data sources did TUAM use?

TUAM primarily used SMF data as its input. SMF records contain detailed information about system resource usage. The product processed these records to create reports. Configuration files defined how SMF data was processed and formatted into reports.

What types of reports did TUAM generate?

TUAM generated reports on resource consumption, including CPU time, I/O operations, and storage usage. These reports could be customized to show usage by user ID, job name, or other criteria. The product provided insights into resource allocation and cost analysis.

Where was TUAM installed and how did it work?

TUAM was typically installed on a z/OS system. It consisted of several components, including data collection, processing, and reporting modules. The product interacted with SMF and other system components to gather and analyze data.

Help Improve This Directory

Notice outdated information? Have insights about this product? Help the mainframe community stay informed with accurate, current data.

Report Issue Suggest Product Share Event

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Take control of your product listings. Add verified information, showcase updates, and unlock a Claimed Vendor badge across the directory.

Claim Your Listing Now

Share Your Product Experience

Tivoli Usage and Accounting Manager for z/OS

Product Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

What was Tivoli Usage and Accounting Manager for z/OS?

What data sources did TUAM use?

What types of reports did TUAM generate?

Where was TUAM installed and how did it work?

What was the command structure of TUAM?

What configuration files or interfaces were used?

What were the main system components and how did they communicate?

What types of APIs did TUAM expose?

What was the business value of TUAM?

How did TUAM help with cost management?

How did TUAM help with resource optimization?

What authentication methods were supported?

What access control model was used?

What encryption was used and where?

What audit/logging capabilities existed?

What administrative interfaces were available?

How was user management handled?

What were the main configuration parameters?

What monitoring/logging capabilities existed?

Related Products

More from IBM

Access 1

ACF/NCP

ACF/SSP

ACO SolutionPac

Ada/370

ADF II

Similar Products

_beta access audit

_beta doc|z plus

_beta doc|z transform

$avers

ACR/Detail

ACR/Summary

Help Improve This Directory

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing