Question 1

What does Task/Master do?

Accepted Answer

Task/Master was a telecommunications manager designed to facilitate communication between applications and terminals, as well as provide file access. It acted as middleware, streamlining transaction processing in mainframe environments.

Question 2

Is this a system, application, or tool?

Accepted Answer

Task/Master is middleware. It provided a structured environment for applications to interact with terminals and access data, acting as an intermediary layer between applications and the underlying system.

Question 3

What types of organizations used this?

Accepted Answer

Organizations that relied on mainframe systems for transaction processing, particularly those in industries like finance and transportation, would have used Task/Master. These organizations needed a reliable way to manage communication between applications and a large number of terminals.

Question 4

When should we consider Task/Master?

Accepted Answer

Task/Master is no longer a viable option as it is not supported. Organizations should consider migrating to modern transaction processing systems that offer enhanced features, scalability, and security.

Question 5

What are the alternatives to Task/Master?

Accepted Answer

Alternatives to Task/Master include modern transaction processing systems such as CICS Transaction Server, IBM TXSeries, and various cloud-based transaction services. These systems offer improved performance, security, and integration capabilities.

Question 6

What infrastructure was required?

Accepted Answer

Task/Master ran on z/OS mainframe systems. It required a compatible telecommunications access method to manage terminal communications and file access.

Question 7

For mainframe products: Does this run in an LPAR?

Accepted Answer

Task/Master operated within the z/OS environment, likely running in an LPAR. It was dependent on z/OS subsystems for core services.

Question 8

What APIs did Task/Master expose?

Accepted Answer

While specific API details for Task/Master are not readily available, it likely provided a set of system calls or interfaces for applications to initiate transactions, manage terminal sessions, and access files. These interfaces would have been specific to the Task/Master environment.

Question 9

What were the main system components?

Accepted Answer

The main components of Task/Master would have included a transaction manager, a terminal handler, and a file access module. The transaction manager coordinated transaction processing, the terminal handler managed communication with terminals, and the file access module provided access to mainframe datasets.

Question 10

What business problems did Task/Master solve?

Accepted Answer

The business value of Task/Master was in providing a structured and efficient environment for transaction processing on mainframe systems. It enabled organizations to handle a large volume of transactions, manage terminal communications, and ensure data integrity.

Question 11

What would happen without this product?

Accepted Answer

Without a system like Task/Master, organizations would face challenges in managing transaction processing, handling terminal communications, and ensuring data integrity. This could lead to inefficiencies, errors, and potential data loss.

Question 12

How did Task/Master reduce costs?

Accepted Answer

Task/Master provided a centralized environment for managing transactions, which helped to reduce operational costs associated with manual processes and data errors. It also improved the efficiency of transaction processing, enabling organizations to handle a higher volume of transactions.

Question 13

How did Task/Master address security?

Accepted Answer

Security in Task/Master would have involved controlling access to mainframe datasets and transaction processing functions. This likely included user authentication and authorization mechanisms to ensure that only authorized users could access sensitive data and perform critical operations.

Question 14

What access control model was used?

Accepted Answer

Task/Master likely employed an access control model to manage user permissions and restrict access to sensitive resources. This could have been based on user roles or individual user accounts, with specific permissions assigned to each.

Question 15

What audit/logging capabilities existed?

Accepted Answer

Task/Master would have included logging capabilities to track user activity and system events. These logs could be used for auditing purposes to identify potential security breaches or unauthorized access attempts.

Question 16

What level of expertise was required?

Accepted Answer

Implementing Task/Master required expertise in mainframe systems and transaction processing. Ongoing operational requirements included monitoring system performance, managing user accounts, and ensuring data integrity.

Question 17

What were common implementation challenges?

Accepted Answer

Common implementation challenges included integrating Task/Master with existing mainframe applications and databases, configuring terminal communications, and ensuring that the system met performance requirements.

Question 18

What administrative interfaces were available?

Accepted Answer

Administrative interfaces for Task/Master likely included a command-line interface (CLI) for system configuration and management. User management would have been handled through z/OS security mechanisms.

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Task/Master

Product Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Task/Master do?

Is this a system, application, or tool?

What types of organizations used this?

When should we consider Task/Master?

What are the alternatives to Task/Master?

What infrastructure was required?

For mainframe products: Does this run in an LPAR?

What APIs did Task/Master expose?

What were the main system components?

What business problems did Task/Master solve?

What would happen without this product?

How did Task/Master reduce costs?

How did Task/Master address security?

What access control model was used?

What audit/logging capabilities existed?

What level of expertise was required?

What were common implementation challenges?

What administrative interfaces were available?

Related Products

Similar Products

Adabas Transaction Manager

Airline Control System

AutoPilot M6 TransactionWorks

CA Datacom/DC

CICS Transaction Server

Com-plete

Help Improve This Directory

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing