Question 1

What is RLX/Translate used for?

Question 2

Accepted Answer

RLX/Translate is a tool designed to translate CLISTs (Command List) into REXX (Restructured Extended Executor) execs. This facilitates the migration of CLIST-based applications to REXX, which offers enhanced capabilities and modern programming features. The tool aids in modernizing legacy systems by converting older CLIST code into more maintainable and flexible REXX code.

Question 3

What are the primary benefits of using RLX/Translate?

Question 4

Accepted Answer

The primary benefits include improved code maintainability, enhanced application performance, and easier integration with modern z/OS environments. REXX provides structured programming constructs, making the translated code more readable and manageable compared to CLISTs. This also allows for better utilization of system resources and easier adaptation to evolving business requirements.

Question 5

How does RLX/Translate handle complex CLIST structures?

Question 6

Accepted Answer

RLX/Translate is designed to handle a wide range of CLIST structures, including control statements, variable manipulation, and system interactions. The tool accurately translates these elements into their REXX equivalents, ensuring that the functionality of the original CLIST is preserved. It also provides options to handle specific CLIST features and system dependencies.

Question 7

Is RLX/Translate a standalone tool, or does it require other components?

Question 8

Accepted Answer

RLX/Translate is typically a standalone tool, but it operates within the z/OS environment. It requires access to the z/OS system and its resources to perform the translation. The tool itself does not depend on external services, but the translated REXX execs may interact with other z/OS components and datasets.

Question 9

What is the command structure for RLX/Translate?

Question 10

Accepted Answer

The command structure typically involves specifying the input CLIST, the output REXX exec, and various options to control the translation process. Common commands include specifying input and output datasets, handling include files, and managing error conditions. The exact syntax depends on the specific implementation and any custom configurations.

Question 11

What configuration files or interfaces are used by RLX/Translate?

Question 12

Accepted Answer

RLX/Translate may use configuration files to define translation rules, handle system-specific settings, and manage user preferences. These files can specify how certain CLIST commands are translated into REXX, how to handle include files, and other customization options. The tool may also provide a command-line interface (CLI) for interactive use.

Question 13

What are the main system components of RLX/Translate?

Question 14

Accepted Answer

The main components include the CLIST parser, the REXX code generator, and the error handling module. The CLIST parser analyzes the input CLIST, the REXX code generator creates the equivalent REXX code, and the error handling module manages any issues during the translation process. These components work together to ensure accurate and efficient translation.

Question 15

What protocols or APIs does RLX/Translate use?

Question 16

Accepted Answer

RLX/Translate does not typically expose APIs or use network protocols for its core functionality. It is a batch-oriented tool that operates within the z/OS environment. The tool interacts with the operating system and datasets through standard z/OS system calls and file I/O operations.

Question 17

How does RLX/Translate reduce costs?

Question 18

Accepted Answer

RLX/Translate reduces costs by automating the migration of CLIST applications to REXX, which lowers the need for manual code conversion. This automation reduces the time and effort required for the migration process, minimizing labor costs and accelerating the modernization of legacy systems. The resulting REXX code is often easier to maintain, further reducing long-term costs.

Question 19

What is the ROI of using RLX/Translate?

Question 20

Accepted Answer

The ROI of using RLX/Translate is realized through reduced migration time, improved code quality, and enhanced application performance. By automating the translation process, organizations can modernize their applications faster, reducing the time to market for new features and improvements. The improved code quality and performance also contribute to a more efficient IT environment.

Question 21

How does RLX/Translate improve developer productivity?

Question 22

Accepted Answer

RLX/Translate improves developer productivity by converting complex CLIST code into more manageable REXX code. REXX's structured programming features make the code easier to understand, debug, and maintain. This reduces the time developers spend on troubleshooting and maintenance, allowing them to focus on new development and enhancements.

Question 23

How does RLX/Translate support business agility?

Question 24

Accepted Answer

RLX/Translate supports business agility by enabling faster adaptation to changing business requirements. The conversion of CLISTs to REXX allows for easier modification and enhancement of applications. This flexibility enables organizations to respond quickly to market changes and implement new features without being constrained by legacy code.

Question 25

What security features are provided by RLX/Translate?

Question 26

Accepted Answer

RLX/Translate itself does not provide security features beyond the standard z/OS security mechanisms. The security of the translated REXX execs depends on the security configurations of the z/OS environment. This includes access control, authentication, and authorization mechanisms provided by z/OS.

Question 27

What authentication methods are supported?

Question 28

Accepted Answer

RLX/Translate does not directly support authentication methods. The authentication is handled by the z/OS system, which supports various methods such as RACF, and other security products. The translated REXX execs inherit the security context of the user who executes them.

Question 29

What access control models are used?

Question 30

Accepted Answer

RLX/Translate does not implement its own access control model. Access control is managed by the z/OS security system, which typically uses Access Control Lists (ACLs) and role-based access control (RBAC) to manage user permissions and access to system resources. The translated REXX execs adhere to these access control policies.

Question 31

Does RLX/Translate use encryption?

Question 32

Accepted Answer

RLX/Translate does not use encryption for its core functionality. The security of data and communications depends on the security features provided by the z/OS environment. Encryption can be implemented at the data storage or network communication levels using z/OS security features.

Question 33

What administrative interfaces are available for RLX/Translate?

Question 34

Accepted Answer

RLX/Translate typically offers a command-line interface (CLI) for administrative tasks. This CLI allows users to specify input and output datasets, configure translation options, and manage the translation process. The CLI is accessed through the z/OS console or batch jobs.

Question 35

How is user management handled?

Question 36

Accepted Answer

User management for RLX/Translate is handled through the z/OS security system. User access and permissions are managed using security products such as RACF or similar tools. Administrators define user profiles and assign appropriate permissions to access and execute the translation tool and related resources.

Question 37

What are the main configuration parameters?

Question 38

Accepted Answer

The main configuration parameters include the input CLIST dataset, the output REXX exec dataset, and various translation options. These options control how the CLIST commands are translated into REXX, how include files are handled, and how error conditions are managed. Configuration can be done through JCL parameters or configuration files.

Question 39

What monitoring and logging capabilities exist?

Question 40

Accepted Answer

RLX/Translate provides logging capabilities to record the translation process, including any errors or warnings encountered. The logs can be used for troubleshooting and auditing. Monitoring is typically done through z/OS system monitoring tools, which track resource usage and job execution.

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

RLX/Translate

Product Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

What is RLX/Translate used for?

undefined

What are the primary benefits of using RLX/Translate?

undefined

How does RLX/Translate handle complex CLIST structures?

undefined

Is RLX/Translate a standalone tool, or does it require other components?

undefined

What is the command structure for RLX/Translate?

undefined

What configuration files or interfaces are used by RLX/Translate?

undefined

What are the main system components of RLX/Translate?

undefined

What protocols or APIs does RLX/Translate use?

undefined

How does RLX/Translate reduce costs?

undefined

What is the ROI of using RLX/Translate?

undefined

How does RLX/Translate improve developer productivity?

undefined

How does RLX/Translate support business agility?

undefined

What security features are provided by RLX/Translate?

undefined

What authentication methods are supported?

undefined

What access control models are used?

undefined

Does RLX/Translate use encryption?

undefined

What administrative interfaces are available for RLX/Translate?

undefined

How is user management handled?

undefined

What are the main configuration parameters?

undefined

What monitoring and logging capabilities exist?

undefined

Related Products

More from Broadcom

Similar Products

Help Improve This Directory

Share Your Product Experience