On what platform did IntelaGen run?

IntelaGen ran on the z/OS platform. It was designed to operate within the mainframe environment, leveraging the resources and services provided by z/OS.

Did it require specific z/OS subsystems?

IntelaGen likely required specific subsystems within z/OS to be present, such as CICS or IMS, depending on the type of applications it was generating. It would have integrated with these subsystems to generate the necessary code and interfaces.

Did IntelaGen have APIs?

While specific API details are unavailable, IntelaGen likely provided interfaces for customizing code generation and integrating with other development tools. These interfaces would have allowed developers to tailor the generated code to meet specific requirements.

What was the business value of IntelaGen?

The primary business value of IntelaGen was to accelerate COBOL application development and reduce the cost of maintenance. By automating code generation, it allowed organizations to deliver applications faster and with fewer errors.

What would happen without it?

Without a tool like IntelaGen, organizations would have to rely on manual COBOL coding, which is more time-consuming and error-prone. This could lead to longer development cycles, higher costs, and lower quality applications.

How did it help with maintenance?

IntelaGen helped organizations maintain their existing COBOL applications by providing a structured approach to code generation and modification. This made it easier to understand and update the code, reducing the risk of introducing errors.

What was the licensing model?

The licensing model for IntelaGen was likely a perpetual license, where organizations paid a one-time fee for the software and then an annual maintenance fee for support and updates. However, given that the product is no longer supported, this is no longer relevant.

What security features did it have?

Security features in IntelaGen would have been focused on controlling access to the code generation environment and the generated code. This would have involved user authentication and authorization mechanisms to ensure that only authorized personnel could access sensitive resources.

What access control model was used?

IntelaGen likely used an access control model based on roles, where users were assigned to roles with specific permissions. This allowed administrators to control who could access and modify application definitions and generated code.

What audit logging capabilities existed?

Audit logging capabilities in IntelaGen would have tracked user activity and changes to application definitions and generated code. This provided a record of who did what and when, which could be used for security auditing and compliance purposes.

What expertise was required for implementation?

Implementing IntelaGen required technical expertise in COBOL development and mainframe systems. Administrators needed to be familiar with z/OS and the subsystems that IntelaGen integrated with.

What were the ongoing operational requirements?

Ongoing operational requirements for IntelaGen included monitoring the code generation environment, managing user access, and ensuring the integrity of application definitions and generated code. This required dedicated staff with the necessary skills and knowledge.

What were common implementation challenges?

Common implementation challenges included integrating IntelaGen with existing development tools and processes, customizing the code generation templates to meet specific requirements, and training developers on how to use the tool effectively.

Share Your Product Experience

Help the community by sharing your experience with mainframe products. Your insights help others make informed decisions.

Share Your Experience

IntelaGen

CA Technologies Not Supported z/OS

CASE/Code Generation Application Development COBOL

Vendor

CA Technologies

Product Overview

IntelaGen was a CASE tool designed to automate COBOL code generation, primarily for mainframe environments running z/OS. It aimed to improve developer productivity and reduce errors in application development. The architecture of IntelaGen likely involved components for parsing application definitions, generating COBOL code, and managing templates.

These components would have worked together to transform high-level specifications into executable code. Given that IntelaGen is no longer supported, organizations should migrate to modern COBOL development tools or consider migrating their COBOL applications to other platforms. Modern COBOL tools offer enhanced features, better integration with other systems, and ongoing support.

Migration to other platforms, such as Java, may require significant effort but can provide long-term benefits. The architectural blueprint for migration should consider the dependencies between COBOL applications and other systems, the skills of the development team, and the long-term goals of the organization. A phased approach to migration is often recommended to minimize risk and disruption.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does IntelaGen do?

IntelaGen was a CASE tool designed to generate COBOL code. It automated parts of the application development process, aiming to increase developer productivity and reduce errors in COBOL programs.

Is this a system, application, or tool?

IntelaGen is best described as a CASE (Computer-Aided Software Engineering) tool. It provided an environment for designing and generating application code, specifically targeting COBOL development.

What types of organizations used this?

Organizations that historically relied on COBOL for their core business applications, such as those in the financial, insurance, and government sectors, would have been the primary users of IntelaGen. These organizations typically have large mainframe systems and a need to maintain or extend existing COBOL applications.

When was IntelaGen most useful?

IntelaGen was most useful when organizations needed to rapidly develop or maintain COBOL applications. It provided a structured approach to code generation, which could reduce development time and improve code quality. However, given its age and lack of support, it is no longer a viable option.

What are the alternatives to IntelaGen?

Alternatives to IntelaGen include modern application development platforms and code generation tools that support COBOL or offer migration paths to other languages. Examples include Micro Focus Visual COBOL, IBM Developer for z/OS, and tools that facilitate the migration of COBOL applications to Java or other platforms.

Help Improve This Directory

Notice outdated information? Have insights about this product? Help the mainframe community stay informed with accurate, current data.

Report Issue Suggest Product Share Event

Share Your Product Experience

Help the community by sharing your experience with mainframe products. Your insights help others make informed decisions.

Share Your Experience

Share Your Product Experience

IntelaGen

Product Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

What does IntelaGen do?

Is this a system, application, or tool?

What types of organizations used this?

When was IntelaGen most useful?

What are the alternatives to IntelaGen?

On what platform did IntelaGen run?

Did it require specific z/OS subsystems?

Did IntelaGen have APIs?

What were the main architectural components?

What was the business value of IntelaGen?

What would happen without it?

How did it help with maintenance?

What was the licensing model?

What security features did it have?

What access control model was used?

What audit logging capabilities existed?

What expertise was required for implementation?

What were the ongoing operational requirements?

What were common implementation challenges?

Related Products

More from CA Technologies

ADC2

AutoMate

CA 90s

CA Alert/VM

CA APAS Insight

CA Automated Code Structuring for COBOL

Similar Products

Ab Initio Business Rules Environment

Access Manager for CICS

Access Manager for IMS

ACCOLADE

ADF II

ADF Tool Pak

Help Improve This Directory

Share Your Product Experience