For mainframe products: Does this run in an LPAR?

DFSMS/MVS ran on the z/OS operating system and within logical partitions (LPARs) on IBM mainframe systems. It was tightly integrated with the z/OS environment and its subsystems.

What are the main system components?

Key components of DFSMS/MVS included DFP (Data Facility Product), DFDSS (Data Facility Storage Management Subsystem), and DFHSM (Data Facility Hierarchical Storage Manager). These components worked together to provide storage management, data movement, and archiving capabilities.

What databases or storage mechanisms were used?

DFSMS/MVS used VSAM (Virtual Storage Access Method) datasets for storing its control information and metadata. It also interacted with other z/OS datasets and storage volumes.

What types of APIs did this product expose?

DFSMS/MVS exposed APIs and interfaces for interacting with its functions. These included command-line interfaces (CLIs) and programming interfaces for authorized programs.

What business value did DFSMS/MVS provide?

DFSMS/MVS provided significant business value by automating storage management tasks, reducing storage costs, and improving data availability. It helped organizations optimize their mainframe storage infrastructure.

What would happen if an organization did NOT use this product?

Without DFSMS/MVS, organizations would face increased manual effort in managing their mainframe storage, leading to higher operational costs and potential data loss. It was essential for efficient mainframe operations.

How did this product integrate with enterprise ecosystems?

DFSMS/MVS integrated with other z/OS components and subsystems, such as SMF, RACF, and catalog management. It also worked with various storage devices and technologies.

How did DFSMS/MVS reduce the total cost of ownership?

DFSMS/MVS helped organizations reduce their total cost of ownership (TCO) for mainframe storage by automating tasks, optimizing storage utilization, and improving data protection. These functions are now incorporated into z/OS base and optional features.

What specific authentication methods were supported?

DFSMS/MVS integrated with RACF (Resource Access Control Facility) for authentication and authorization. It used access control lists (ACLs) to control access to datasets and storage resources.

What access control model was used?

DFSMS/MVS used an access control model based on access control lists (ACLs) to manage permissions for datasets and storage volumes. It allowed administrators to define granular access rights for users and groups.

What audit/logging capabilities existed?

DFSMS/MVS provided audit logging capabilities to track access to datasets and storage resources. It generated SMF (System Management Facilities) records for security events.

What encryption was used and where?

DFSMS/MVS supported encryption for data at rest and in transit. It used cryptographic algorithms to protect sensitive data from unauthorized access. Encryption capabilities are now part of z/OS base and optional features.

What administrative interfaces were available?

DFSMS/MVS provided administrative interfaces through command-line tools and ISMF (Interactive Storage Management Facility). ISMF provided a GUI for managing storage resources.

How was user management handled?

User management in DFSMS/MVS was handled through RACF (Resource Access Control Facility). RACF was used to define users, groups, and their access rights to storage resources.

What monitoring/logging capabilities existed?

DFSMS/MVS provided monitoring and logging capabilities through SMF (System Management Facilities). SMF records were used to track storage usage, performance, and security events.

What were common implementation challenges?

Implementing DFSMS/MVS required expertise in z/OS storage management and related technologies. Common challenges included configuring storage policies, managing datasets, and ensuring data availability.

Share Your Product Experience

Help the community by sharing your experience with mainframe products. Your insights help others make informed decisions.

Share Your Experience

DFSMS/MVS

IBM Not Supported z/OS

Disk Administration Files and Datasets

Vendor

IBM

Product Overview

DFSMS/MVS architecture centered around three main components: DFP, DFDSS, and DFHSM. DFP provided core data facility functions, DFDSS handled data movement and backup/recovery, and DFHSM managed hierarchical storage. These components communicated through z/OS system services and VSAM datasets.

DFSMS/MVS integrated with RACF for security, using ACLs to manage access to datasets. It also utilized SMF for monitoring and logging. DFSMS/MVS is no longer supported; organizations should migrate to z/OS integrated features or third-party solutions.

Alternatives include CA Disk, CA TLMS, and BMC AMI Storage. The migration involves re-architecting storage management processes to align with the new solution. This includes reassessing storage policies, adapting to new APIs, and ensuring compatibility with existing z/OS infrastructure.

A detailed architecture blueprint should outline the transition steps and dependencies.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does DFSMS/MVS do?

DFSMS/MVS provided a comprehensive storage management system for the z/OS operating system. It automated and simplified tasks related to data storage, backup, and recovery. It was a system-level product.

What business problem did it solve?

DFSMS/MVS solved the business problem of efficiently managing large volumes of data on mainframe systems. Without it, organizations would face increased manual effort, higher storage costs, and greater risk of data loss.

What types of organizations used this?

DFSMS/MVS was primarily used by large enterprises that relied on mainframe systems for their core business operations. These included organizations in industries such as banking, insurance, and government.

What infrastructure was required?

DFSMS/MVS was a core component of z/OS and required the z/OS operating system to function. It also relied on specific subsystems such as the System Management Facilities (SMF) for monitoring and reporting.

What are the alternatives to DFSMS/MVS?

Alternatives to DFSMS/MVS include modern storage management solutions and data management tools that are compatible with z/OS. DFSMS functions are now incorporated into z/OS base and optional features.

Help Improve This Directory

Notice outdated information? Have insights about this product? Help the mainframe community stay informed with accurate, current data.

Report Issue Suggest Product Share Event

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Take control of your product listings. Add verified information, showcase updates, and unlock a Claimed Vendor badge across the directory.

Claim Your Listing Now