What infrastructure was required?

OfficeVision VM ran on the IBM z/VM operating system. It required a mainframe environment with sufficient processing power, memory, and storage to support the application and its users.

For mainframe products: Did this run in an LPAR?

OfficeVision VM ran within an LPAR (Logical Partition) on an IBM mainframe. It was not directly dependent on z/OS but often integrated with z/OS systems for data access and security.

What were the main system components?

OfficeVision VM included components such as the central server, email server, document management system, and user interface. These components communicated using IBM's Systems Network Architecture (SNA) and other proprietary protocols.

What was the role of XEDIT?

The XEDIT editor was a core component of OfficeVision VM, providing a powerful text editing environment for creating and modifying documents and files. It supported a wide range of editing commands and features.

What business problems did it solve?

OfficeVision VM provided business value by streamlining office workflows, improving communication, and enabling better document management. It helped organizations improve productivity and reduce costs associated with paper-based processes.

What would happen if an organization did not use this product?

Without OfficeVision VM, organizations would have relied on manual, paper-based processes for managing documents, email, and calendars. This could lead to inefficiencies, errors, and increased costs.

What was the typical licensing model?

OfficeVision VM was typically licensed on a per-user basis. The total cost of ownership included the cost of the software licenses, hardware infrastructure, implementation services, and ongoing maintenance and support.

What specific authentication methods were supported?

OfficeVision VM supported various authentication methods, including mainframe security systems such as RACF (Resource Access Control Facility). It also provided access control lists (ACLs) for managing user permissions.

What access control model was used?

OfficeVision VM used an access control list (ACL) model to manage user permissions. ACLs defined which users or groups had access to specific resources, such as documents and calendars.

What audit/logging capabilities existed?

OfficeVision VM provided audit logging capabilities to track user activity and system events. These logs could be used to monitor security and compliance.

How was this product typically deployed?

OfficeVision VM was typically deployed on-premise in a mainframe data center. Implementation required technical expertise in z/VM, mainframe systems, and networking.

What ongoing operational requirements existed?

Ongoing operational requirements included monitoring system performance, managing user accounts, applying software updates, and ensuring data backups. This required dedicated IT staff with mainframe skills.

What administrative interfaces were available?

Administrative interfaces included command-line tools and ISPF panels. User management was handled through mainframe security systems such as RACF.

Share Your Product Experience

Help the community by sharing your experience with mainframe products. Your insights help others make informed decisions.

Share Your Experience

OfficeVision VM

IBM Not Supported z/VM

email Content Books and Documents

Vendor

IBM

Product Overview

OfficeVision VM's architecture centered around a mainframe-based server providing email, calendaring, and document management services. Key components included the central server, email server, document management system, and user interface, communicating via SNA. Data was stored in mainframe databases.

The system integrated with mainframe security systems like RACF for authentication and access control. Migration to modern platforms requires a phased approach. First, assess the current architecture and dependencies.

Second, select a target platform such as Microsoft Exchange, Google Workspace, or HCL Notes. Third, develop a migration plan that addresses data migration, application integration, and user training. Finally, implement the migration plan and validate the new environment.

Consider a hybrid approach, where some services remain on the mainframe while others are migrated to the cloud.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does OfficeVision VM do?

OfficeVision VM provided email, calendaring, document management, and office automation capabilities on IBM's z/VM platform. It enabled users to create, share, and manage documents, send and receive email, and schedule meetings.

Is this a system, application, or tool?

OfficeVision VM was an application suite that provided a range of office productivity tools. It was built on top of the z/VM operating system and provided services to end users.

What types of organizations used this?

Organizations that relied on IBM mainframe systems for their core business processes used OfficeVision VM. These organizations were often large enterprises in industries such as banking, finance, insurance, and government.

When should a company have considered OfficeVision VM?

Companies considered OfficeVision VM when they needed an integrated office automation solution tightly coupled with their existing IBM mainframe infrastructure. It provided a centralized platform for managing documents, email, and calendars.

What are the alternatives to OfficeVision VM?

Alternatives to OfficeVision VM include modern email and collaboration platforms such as Microsoft Exchange, Google Workspace, and Lotus Domino (now HCL Notes). These platforms offer similar functionality with more modern interfaces and deployment options.

Help Improve This Directory

Notice outdated information? Have insights about this product? Help the mainframe community stay informed with accurate, current data.

Report Issue Suggest Product Share Event

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing

Take control of your product listings. Add verified information, showcase updates, and unlock a Claimed Vendor badge across the directory.

Claim Your Listing Now

Share Your Product Experience

OfficeVision VM

Product Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

What does OfficeVision VM do?

Is this a system, application, or tool?

What types of organizations used this?

When should a company have considered OfficeVision VM?

What are the alternatives to OfficeVision VM?

What infrastructure was required?

For mainframe products: Did this run in an LPAR?

What were the main system components?

What was the role of XEDIT?

What business problems did it solve?

What would happen if an organization did not use this product?

What was the typical licensing model?

What specific authentication methods were supported?

What access control model was used?

What audit/logging capabilities existed?

How was this product typically deployed?

What ongoing operational requirements existed?

What administrative interfaces were available?

Related Products

More from IBM

Access 1

ACF/NCP

ACF/SSP

ACO SolutionPac

Ada/370

ADF II

Similar Products

Application Support Facility

Application/Fax

BookManager

BookMaster

CICS/Morning News

CLASY

Help Improve This Directory

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing