Question 1

What was the primary function of Message Driven Processor?

Accepted Answer

Message Driven Processor was designed to facilitate communication between client applications and CICS-based systems. It enabled the exchange of messages, allowing for asynchronous processing and integration of different systems. The product's core function was to provide a bridge for message-oriented middleware.

Question 2

When was Message Driven Processor initially released?

Accepted Answer

The product was originally released by Early, Cloud & Company in 1993. It was designed to address the need for integrating client applications with CICS environments using message-based communication.

Question 3

Which platforms did Message Driven Processor support?

Accepted Answer

Message Driven Processor was designed to operate on the z/OS platform, providing a solution for mainframe-based messaging and integration needs.

Question 4

What was the core architectural design of Message Driven Processor?

Accepted Answer

Message Driven Processor's architecture was centered around message queues and a message processing engine. It facilitated the exchange of messages between different applications, enabling asynchronous communication and integration.

Question 5

What type of API did Message Driven Processor expose, and what were its key features?

Accepted Answer

The product utilized a proprietary API for message interaction. Specific API details, including endpoint patterns and method names, are not available due to the product's end-of-life status. The API facilitated the sending, receiving, and processing of messages within the system.

Question 6

What protocols did Message Driven Processor use for communication?

Accepted Answer

Message Driven Processor's communication relied on proprietary protocols optimized for mainframe environments. These protocols ensured reliable message delivery and efficient data transfer between components. Specific protocol details are unavailable.

Question 7

What were the main system components of Message Driven Processor?

Accepted Answer

The main components included a message queue manager, a message processing engine, and various adapters for interacting with CICS applications. These components worked together to handle message routing, processing, and delivery.

Question 8

How was Message Driven Processor configured?

Accepted Answer

Configuration was managed through JCL and specific control statements. These configurations defined message queues, routing rules, and other operational parameters. The exact configuration files and interfaces are not available.

Question 9

What business value did Message Driven Processor offer?

Accepted Answer

Message Driven Processor provided a means to integrate client applications with CICS systems, enabling asynchronous communication and improved application interoperability. This facilitated the development of more flexible and responsive systems.

Question 10

How did Message Driven Processor contribute to system architecture and design?

Accepted Answer

By enabling message-based communication, Message Driven Processor allowed for the decoupling of applications. This decoupling improved system resilience and allowed for independent scaling of different components.

Question 11

What specific problems did Message Driven Processor solve?

Accepted Answer

The product aimed to streamline the integration of client applications with CICS environments, reducing the complexity of connecting disparate systems. This simplification improved development and maintenance efforts.

Question 12

What authentication methods did Message Driven Processor support?

Accepted Answer

Due to the product's end-of-life status, specific details regarding security features are unavailable. However, it likely supported authentication mechanisms to control access to the system and its resources.

Question 13

What access control model did Message Driven Processor use?

Accepted Answer

The access control model likely involved user authentication and authorization to manage access to system resources. The specific model is not available.

Question 14

What audit and logging capabilities did Message Driven Processor have?

Accepted Answer

Message Driven Processor likely included audit logging capabilities to track system activities and security-related events. This allowed for monitoring and investigation of system behavior.

Question 15

What administrative interfaces were available for Message Driven Processor?

Accepted Answer

Administrative interfaces were likely provided through a combination of CLI commands and potentially a GUI interface for monitoring and management. The specific interfaces are not available.

Question 16

How was user management handled in Message Driven Processor?

Accepted Answer

User management was likely handled through system-level user accounts and potentially integrated with security systems. The specific details are not available.

Question 17

What monitoring capabilities were available in Message Driven Processor?

Accepted Answer

Monitoring capabilities likely included the ability to track message queues, system performance, and error conditions. These features helped administrators maintain system health and troubleshoot issues.

Share Your Product Experience

Message Driven processor

Product Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the primary function of Message Driven Processor?

When was Message Driven Processor initially released?

Which platforms did Message Driven Processor support?

What was the core architectural design of Message Driven Processor?

What type of API did Message Driven Processor expose, and what were its key features?

What protocols did Message Driven Processor use for communication?

What were the main system components of Message Driven Processor?

How was Message Driven Processor configured?

What business value did Message Driven Processor offer?

How did Message Driven Processor contribute to system architecture and design?

What specific problems did Message Driven Processor solve?

What authentication methods did Message Driven Processor support?

What access control model did Message Driven Processor use?

What audit and logging capabilities did Message Driven Processor have?

What administrative interfaces were available for Message Driven Processor?

How was user management handled in Message Driven Processor?

What monitoring capabilities were available in Message Driven Processor?

Related Products

Similar Products

3270 SUPEROPTIMIZER/CICS

Access Manager for CICS

ACCOLADE

ACI Communication Services

ACI Host Link

Across the Boards

Help Improve This Directory

Are You a Vendor? Claim Your Listing